Star Wars-The Phantom Menace
Okay. I admit it. I was
a Star Wars geek. I saw all the movies as soon as they came out. I
had all the books and videos and records and everything. But that was a long time
ago, and like everything else, I've moved on. So I've had mixed emotions about
returning to the world of George Lucas. For one thing, I lost interest in the series
when The Return of the Jedi was such a serious fall-off from the first two films.
Also, Lucas' oeuvre ever since then has been severely suspect -- remember Howard
The Duck and Radioland Murders? Besides, I try to avoid things that are
surrounded in a blanket of hype.
Well, while watching The Phantom Menace, I
have to admit I got swept up in the spectacle of the whole thing. The effects are
indeed awesome. That said, Phantom is probably the most inconsequential of
the Star Wars movies (even less meaningful than the inferior Jedi.) It
spends so much time setting up the storyline that not much really happens.
Some of the new characters like Qui-Gon Jinn (Liam Neeson) are fascinating. But
more often -- like Ewan McGregor's take on Obi-Wan Kenobi and Samuel L. Jackson's Mace
Winou and Natalie Portman's Queen Amidala (the latest in Lucas' line of poorly-coiffured
monarchs) the people are underexplored ciphers. And the new plush-toy-in-the-making
Jar Jar Binks is annoying in his cutesiness (and his computer-generated movements make him
seem even more of a cartoon.)
Perhaps it isn't really even fair to review this movie
at all, any more than to say what you think of a play after only the first act has been
done. However, you would think that if Lucas is going to release the rest of this
story every two or three years, he'd make sure the individual parts stood on their
own. He understood that the first time around. (5/99)